
Experienced Partition Action Lawyers in Burbank
California partition actions provide a legal mechanism for co-owners of real property to divide the property among themselves. The partition statutes allow a co-owner to file a lawsuit in court to have the property divided, either physically or by sale. The court will then order the division of the property in a way that is fair and equitable to all parties. The partition statutes also provide that any proceeds from the sale of the property must be divided among the co-owners in proportion to their respective interests in the property. The valuable real estate in Burbank often creates disagreements between co-owners that can only be solved by a Los Angeles partition attorney skilled in the judicial procedures in Los Angeles County.
- Can I be forced into selling a jointly owned house? Under California’s Partition of Real Property Act, a co-owner will have a right to buyout the property. However, absent a buy out at the appraised price, a plaintiff will likely be able to force the sale of a jointly owned house.
- How long will it take for the plaintiff to receive his or her share of the sales proceeds? Usually, the property is marketed for sale or purchased by the defendant in 3 to 6 months. If a referee is appointed, that may take 6 to 9 months. With proper drafting of an interlocutory judgment of partition by sale, the referee can be required to disburse the proceeds promptly at the close of escrow or shortly thereafter.
- What are the potential outcomes of a partition action? The most likely outcome in a partition action is that the plaintiff receives fair value for their interest in the property either through a sale to a third party or to the defendant. In rare cases, a property can be divided, through this is not applicable to single family residences with no surplus land.
- Who pays for a partition action? In California, each party typically pays for their own attorney’s fees (known as the “American Rule”). However, California partition law allows for an exception to this rule, stating that “the court shall apportion the costs of partition among the parties in proportion to their interests or make such other apportionment as may be equitable.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.040. Indeed, the court may award “reasonable attorney’s fees incurred or paid by a party for the common benefit.” California Code of Civil Procedure 874.010(a).
- Can you lose interest in a jointly owned home by moving out? Generally, co-owners maintain their ownership interests regardless of whether they live at the property. However, in rare cases, leaving the property for many years without paying taxes or other expenses may allow the co-owners in possession to argue that they have adversely possessed the property. Generally, these co-ownership disputes do not get easier with time, so it is important to act promptly.

Partition Actions in Burbank
Partition actions are common in the City of Burbank.
91501, 91502, 91504, 91505, 91506, 91521, 91522, 91523, 91526
Burbank includes the of zip codes.
Partition Actions Under California Law
Gray v. Superior Court
In the legal case of Gray v. Superior Court, 52 Cal.App.4th 165 (1997), the issue was whether a partition action could be brought against a tenant in common who had not been served with the complaint. The court held that a partition action could not be brought against a tenant in common who had not been served with the complaint, as the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action. The court reasoned that a partition action is a form of equitable relief, and that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests. The court also noted that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests, and that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests. The court also noted that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests, and that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests. The court also noted that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests, and that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests. The court also noted that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests, and that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests. The court also noted that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests, and that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests. The court also noted that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in order to protect their interests, and that the tenant in common had a right to be heard in the action in

Contact our Team of Experienced Partition Lawyers Serving the City of Burbank, California


Contact Experienced Partition Attorney Scott Talkov
(818) 900-7700
Experienced California Partition Attorney Serving Burbank
When faced with a disagreement with your co-owner regarding the sale of your property in Burbank, our partition attorneys in Los Angeles County are here to safeguard your rights and expedite the resolution process through court intervention. With extensive expertise in resolving co-ownership disputes in Burbank, California, we can assist you in unlocking the value of your property. To schedule a complimentary 15-minute consultation with one of our dedicated partition attorneys at Partition Los Angeles, simply reach out to us via phone at (818) 900-7700 or complete an online contact form.
